Nietzsche — the slave revolt that inverted all values
Nietzsche argued that what we call "morality" is not universal — it has a history. Two fundamentally different valuations have existed: master morality and slave morality. And in the slave revolt, the values of the weak were imposed on the world as the values.
Two moralities coexist — master values and slave values.
Master Morality
The noble, the active, the aristocratic
Core Distinction
Good / Bad
Orientation
Self-affirmation — defines "good" from one's own strength
Source of Values
Active, creative, overflowing — values spring from power
"Bad" Means
Low, common, weak — but not morally condemned, just different
Attitude to Others
Indifference to the weak — pity is a sign of weakness
Psychological Type
Noble, leonine, spontaneous — acts first, reflects later
Slave Morality
The reactive, the resentful, the priestly
Core Distinction
Good / Evil
Orientation
Reactive — defines "good" by opposing the enemy
Source of Values
Ressentiment — hatred of the strong, disguised as virtue
"Good" Now Means
Humble, meek, poor in spirit — the former "bad" is now "good"
Attitude to Masters
The "good" of master morality becomes "evil" — the inversion is complete
Psychological Type
Resentful, calculating, patient — waits and plots revenge through values
The key psychological concept. Unlike the noble who forgets insults quickly, the slave broods. Unable to act directly against the powerful, the slave takes revenge in imagination — by revaluing all values. The weak declare: "you powerful people are evil; we humble people are good." This is not weakness overcome — it is weakness transformed into a weapon.
Read Nietzsche with Millerman
Get notified when new courses and materials are released.